Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
A Ukrainian serviceman in Mykolaiv’s regional military administration building, which was hit by a Russian missile in March
A Ukrainian serviceman in Mykolaiv’s regional military administration building, which was hit by a Russian missile in March. Photograph: Evgeniy Maloletka/AP
A Ukrainian serviceman in Mykolaiv’s regional military administration building, which was hit by a Russian missile in March. Photograph: Evgeniy Maloletka/AP

Amnesty regrets ‘distress’ caused by claims in Ukraine report

This article is more than 1 year old

Rights group defends allegations that military endangered civilians but says none of them justify Russia’s actions

Amnesty International has said it “deeply regrets the distress and anger” caused after it alleged that Ukrainian forces were flouting international law by exposing civilians to Russian fire.

“We fully stand by our findings,” the rights group said on Sunday, but it stressed that “nothing we documented Ukrainian forces doing in any way justifies Russian violations”.

Amnesty sparked outrage in Ukraine with the publication of a report on Thursday that accused the military of endangering civilians by establishing bases in schools and hospitals, and launching counterattacks from heavily populated areas.

The head of Amnesty’s Ukraine office resigned in protest, accusing the rights organisation of parroting Kremlin propaganda.

Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, said the group had tried to “shift the responsibility from the aggressor to the victim”.

Amnesty’s report listed instances in which Ukrainian forces appeared to have exposed civilians to danger in 19 towns and villages in the Kharkiv, Donbas and Mykolaiv regions.

In its statement on Sunday, the rights group refused to back down on that assessment.

It “found instances where Ukrainian forces had located themselves right next to where civilians were living, thereby potentially putting them at risk from incoming Russian fire”.

“We made this assessment based on the rules of international humanitarian law, which require all parties to a conflict to avoid locating, to the maximum extent feasible, military objectives within or near densely populated areas,” it said.

Nevertheless, Amnesty recognised the scale of reaction its report had triggered.

Sign up to First Edition, our free daily newsletter – every weekday morning at 7am BST

“Amnesty International deeply regrets the distress and anger that our press release on the Ukrainian military’s fighting tactics has caused,” it said.

Since Russia invaded in February, Amnesty said it had interviewed hundreds of Ukrainian victims “whose stories illuminate the brutal reality of Russia’s war of aggression”.

“We have challenged the world to demonstrate its solidarity with Ukrainians through concrete action, and we will continue to do so.”

Most viewed

Most viewed